Archive for November, 2009

I owe my MMA fan friends an apology :)

November 27, 2009

I’ve been giving my mixed martial arts fan friends a bad time about the sport (“dog fighting for people”, etc.)  Apparently, the fan base isn’t quite what I thought it was.  http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=117972

Data from Scarborough Sports Marketing shows that 8% of U.S. adults are mixed martial arts (MMA) fans — those who watched the sport on broadcast or cable in the past year.

That group is 15% more likely than the average adult to have a household income of $75,000-plus, and 10% more likely to own a second home.

Furthermore, MMA fans account for 15% of adults planning to buy a luxury vehicle within the next year, and represent 10% of the potential market for new SUV purchases.

I still don’t get it…

I’m pretty sure that I would die if I used this app

November 25, 2009

WIKITUDE Drive application demo video.  Pretty cool.  Pretty sure I’d die.

Here’s an idea for Mr. Murdoch

November 24, 2009

BoomTown’s Kara Swisher wrote a great piece discussing the Murdoch vs. Google showdown.  She makes the observation that:

There is a lot more money to be made in searching for content than in making it.

If that’s true (is it really?) Murdoch shouldn’t be playing Google and Bing off each other.  He should work to build the search engine for the newspaper industry.  If he really wants to play this out, he shouldn’t run to Bing.  He (rather, the industry) should build his (its) own.

The search property (perhaps called http://NewsAllOver.com) would be jointly owned by the largest news providers (AP, Gannett, Tribune, New York Times, etc.).  Hulu, from the television world, could be the model (in terms of ownership).

All participating news organizations would block other search engines from indexing them.  Consumers would quickly come to realize that NewsAllOver.com is the place to search for news.

Of course, the news industry has tried similar things in the past that have not played out well (e.g., Classified Ventures).  Perhaps, at this point in the decline of the Western Print Empire, there might be more motivation to try.

The rules for participation, ownership structure, etc. would all need to be worked out.

Why not?  Seems more rational than banking on Bing.

Update 11/25: Belo and Dean Singleton (MediaNews) might join in on the Google blocking thing.

Should online commenters be allowed anonymity? I tend to think yes.

November 23, 2009

Here is an interesting post arguing that those commenting on blogs, etc. should not be allowed to remain anonymous.  It’s really a publisher choice, assuming the site is not government run (not much to debate).  At least with certain topics (e.g., politics) it probably makes sense to allow commenters to remain anonymous.  Voting is private for a very good reason.

Justice Scalia dossier and privacy rights

November 23, 2009

This is a really interesting story.  Justice Scalia maintains that there is no privacy right to the scads of individual items of personal data floating around the Internet.  However, when a Fordham Law School class created a 15 page dossier on Scalia (based on information pulled from public sources on the web) he wasn’t happy.  Justice Scalia objected based on his conclusion that the exercise demonstrated bad judgment (which is, ultimately, protected by the First Amendment).

This is yet another example of the tension between privacy rights and the First Amendment.  Development of frictionless information distribution via the web is gas thrown on the fire of this issue.

Read the following post on AboveTheLaw.com

http://abovethelaw.com/2009/04/fordham_law_compiling_a_dossie.php

New AOL logo. Why does this feel sad?

November 23, 2009

From The New York Times:

A new brand identity for AOL, when it is spun off from Time Warner, replaces the letters AOL with “Aol.” — complete with a period.

http://s.nyt.com/u/C9g

Crazy Like a Fox (Network)

November 23, 2009

The debate is raging over Murdoch’s plan to “not give away” his content. I will admit that my first reaction was that the old codger was playing in deep right field. However, I’m starting to come around.

It will take more than Murdoch’s unilateral action. He will need to bring the other news organizations along. If Bing is willing to pay for exclusive search access, this becomes pretty interesting. In fact, in theory, consumers might not need to pick up the content bill (although I’m guessing we will still be asked to pay somthing to access the “cable network of online news”). However, Bing isn’t the sole solution to the news industry’s woes.

As a news junkie, I will switch to Bing if that’s where I need to go to search for news. Furthermore, when push comes to shove, I will pay for online news, just as I pay for print.

Testing WordPress app for iPhone

November 21, 2009

I’m testing the WordPress iPhone app. I give it a thumbs up.

VooDoo Doughnut pit stop

November 20, 2009

The tension between the First Amendment and privacy rights (RateMyCop.com case)

November 20, 2009

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/09/publishingcrime/

A Florida man facing a year in jail for the online posting of a local police officer’s phone number and address is challenging the 37-year-old state law on First Amendment grounds.Arizona is believed to be the only other state with a similar law. A similar Washington state law was overturned on First Amendment grounds in 2004.

The Florida federal court case is being brought by Robert Brayshaw, who posted the personal information of a Florida officer last year on the popular website Ratemycop. The statute does not require that the information be published on the internet. A local judge tossed the case on procedural grounds, saying prosecutors failed to bring the case to trial within Florida’s 90-day speedy trial rules.

Brayshaw’s attorney, James Green, said his 34-year-old client was the only person ever facing trial for allegedly violating the 1972 law that carries a maximum one-year jail term. His client brought suit (.pdf) Friday in federal court to overturn the law in a bid to continue exercising his First Amendment rights of speech, Green said.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.