Archive for November 23rd, 2009

Should online commenters be allowed anonymity? I tend to think yes.

November 23, 2009

Here is an interesting post arguing that those commenting on blogs, etc. should not be allowed to remain anonymous.  It’s really a publisher choice, assuming the site is not government run (not much to debate).  At least with certain topics (e.g., politics) it probably makes sense to allow commenters to remain anonymous.  Voting is private for a very good reason.

Justice Scalia dossier and privacy rights

November 23, 2009

This is a really interesting story.  Justice Scalia maintains that there is no privacy right to the scads of individual items of personal data floating around the Internet.  However, when a Fordham Law School class created a 15 page dossier on Scalia (based on information pulled from public sources on the web) he wasn’t happy.  Justice Scalia objected based on his conclusion that the exercise demonstrated bad judgment (which is, ultimately, protected by the First Amendment).

This is yet another example of the tension between privacy rights and the First Amendment.  Development of frictionless information distribution via the web is gas thrown on the fire of this issue.

Read the following post on AboveTheLaw.com

http://abovethelaw.com/2009/04/fordham_law_compiling_a_dossie.php

New AOL logo. Why does this feel sad?

November 23, 2009

From The New York Times:

A new brand identity for AOL, when it is spun off from Time Warner, replaces the letters AOL with “Aol.” — complete with a period.

http://s.nyt.com/u/C9g

Crazy Like a Fox (Network)

November 23, 2009

The debate is raging over Murdoch’s plan to “not give away” his content. I will admit that my first reaction was that the old codger was playing in deep right field. However, I’m starting to come around.

It will take more than Murdoch’s unilateral action. He will need to bring the other news organizations along. If Bing is willing to pay for exclusive search access, this becomes pretty interesting. In fact, in theory, consumers might not need to pick up the content bill (although I’m guessing we will still be asked to pay somthing to access the “cable network of online news”). However, Bing isn’t the sole solution to the news industry’s woes.

As a news junkie, I will switch to Bing if that’s where I need to go to search for news. Furthermore, when push comes to shove, I will pay for online news, just as I pay for print.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.